![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 7 of 7. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou PIlder on June 5, 2013, at 7:09:10
Mr Hsiung and his deputy,
In regards to your reminder provision, there are 4 additional outstanding notifications frm me.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Phillipa on June 8, 2013, at 9:48:08
In reply to Lou's eminder to Mr Hsiung and his deputy-phoarmor, posted by Lou PIlder on June 5, 2013, at 7:09:10
How come the outstanding notifications if they are public don't get answered? Just curious? Phillipa
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 8, 2013, at 14:39:27
In reply to Re: Lou's eminder to Mr Hsiung and his deputy-phoarmor » Lou PIlder, posted by Phillipa on June 8, 2013, at 9:48:08
> How come the outstanding notifications if they are public don't get answered? Just curious? Phillipa
Phillipa,
There are reasons that Mr Hsiung gives in some of the posts here. This is involved in his thinking that what he does will be good for this community as a whole. It also involves what is meant by {supportive}. It also involves Mr Hsiung's policy that he doesn't wait to sanction a statement because one match could start a forest fire.
But it is much more than that. You see, Mr Hsiung does state that it might be good that people see that my requests/notifications to him are not responded to. I have asked Mr Hsiung in the thread above this thread some questions that if they are responded to, then I could have the opportunity to respond to Mr Hsiung's answers to me.
Readers here could see the years of statements that could foster hatred, in particular but not limited to, the Jews. And also statements that could arouse anti-Semitic feelings and foster hatred as being supportive by the nature that those anti-Semitic statements are allowed to stand. This could lead readers to think that those statements are supportive because Mr Hsiung states that support takes precedence here.
Now I have posted that psychologists have studied hate and how it can be transferred to others and IMHHO keep one from overcoming depression and addiction. Now if hate is allowed to be posted here in particular but not limited toward the Jews as having the potential for readers to think that hate is supportive, then readers could formulate in their minds what {will be good for this community as a whole } means. I am prevented from posting the historical parallels to this type of thinking here due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr Hsiung. But I say to you, that I know what is plainly visible to me here and I am asking readers to go to the following thread and post a declaration as to if you are or are not a member of the subset of people that Mr Hsiung writes about here that may think that it is good to see that my requests/notifications are not responded to.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1044862.html
Posted by sigismund on June 8, 2013, at 15:08:21
In reply to Lou's response » Phillipa, posted by Lou Pilder on June 8, 2013, at 14:39:27
> in particular but not limited to, the Jews
Lou, IMO, if anything it is the other way round. After the attacks on New York and the military reaction, there were, understandably, reactions along the lines of nuke em. Especially those on the receiving end of American power.
There are a few posts from people who read the Bible to mean that the Jews killed Jesus and people who do not accept him will burn in hell, or whatever.
But to depict this as the overall tenor of Babble is misleading.
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 8, 2013, at 15:29:43
In reply to Re: Lou's response » Lou Pilder, posted by sigismund on June 8, 2013, at 15:08:21
> > in particular but not limited to, the Jews
>
> Lou, IMO, if anything it is the other way round. After the attacks on New York and the military reaction, there were, understandably, reactions along the lines of nuke em. Especially those on the receiving end of American power.
>
> There are a few posts from people who read the Bible to mean that the Jews killed Jesus and people who do not accept him will burn in hell, or whatever.
>
> But to depict this as the overall tenor of Babble is misleading.Sig,
I am not depicting this to be the overall tenor here. That is why I use ,{in particular BUT NOT LIMITED TO} (emphasis mine).
People can see the years of outstanding requests/ notifications from me here. It is that there are those years of outstanding requests from me to Mr Hsiung that is my subject here, for the initiator of this thread initiated my response.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 9, 2013, at 8:30:04
In reply to Lou's response-in particular/not limited to » sigismund, posted by Lou Pilder on June 8, 2013, at 15:29:43
> > > in particular but not limited to, the Jews
> >
> > Lou, IMO, if anything it is the other way round. After the attacks on New York and the military reaction, there were, understandably, reactions along the lines of nuke em. Especially those on the receiving end of American power.
> >
> > There are a few posts from people who read the Bible to mean that the Jews killed Jesus and people who do not accept him will burn in hell, or whatever.
> >
> > But to depict this as the overall tenor of Babble is misleading.
>
> Sig,
> I am not depicting this to be the overall tenor here. That is why I use ,{in particular BUT NOT LIMITED TO} (emphasis mine).
> People can see the years of outstanding requests/ notifications from me here. It is that there are those years of outstanding requests from me to Mr Hsiung that is my subject here, for the initiator of this thread initiated my response.
> Lou
>
> Friends,
It is written above concerning that there are statements that could arouse anti-Semitic feelings that are allowed to stand. The poster states that there are a "few" of those accusing the Jews and defaming Judaism. My friends, how many times must a man turn his head and say that he doesn't have to respond? One, two three, four, five , six, seven, eight? And how many years must it take before they are addressed? And how many members will turn their heads to those posts that are considered to be supportive, because support takes precedence according to Mr Hsiung, and leave them for people to read? And how many deaths will it take before the members are allowed to know from me? And those murdered Jewish children that were murdered by Jew-haters that were indoctrinated to think that they were superior to Jews, that heaped their ashes that are blowing in the wind, those children can not speak here, but I will speak for them. And I say to all of you that say that a few posts that accuse Jews and defame Jews that could arouse anti-Semitic feelings are allowed to stand here, that one match could start a forest fire. The fire that is allowed to spread from here could burn in the minds of the readers that think that the statements that defame the Jews are supportive. That fire could have the winds reverse it to come back and burn in the minds of members here so that they could not overcome depression and addiction, and infuse hatred in the minds of some toward the Jews and that hate could be transferred to themselves so that they kill themselves and or others. And Mr Hsiung states that he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 9, 2013, at 11:20:05
In reply to Re: Lou's eminder to Mr Hsiung and his deputy-phoarmor » Lou PIlder, posted by Phillipa on June 8, 2013, at 9:48:08
> How come the outstanding notifications if they are public don't get answered? Just curious? Phillipa
Phillipa and others,
Here is a post that I would like for you to consider if you are going to respond here. When Mr Hsiung posted that, I took him at his word.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1020768.html
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.