![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 6 of 6. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on April 8, 2008, at 16:24:22
Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
In regards to the procedure for reminding the administartion concerning outstanding requests, I sent two notifications a few days ago that one is outstanding.
Lou PIlder
Posted by Lou Pilder on April 18, 2008, at 6:34:27
In reply to Lou's request to the administration-notif-B, posted by Lou Pilder on April 8, 2008, at 16:24:22
> Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
> In regards to the procedure for reminding the administartion concerning outstanding requests, I sent two notifications a few days ago that one is outstanding.
> Lou PIlderMr. Hsiung and his deputies,
In regards to your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the notification in question was one of two that was sent on April 5, 2008
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on April 23, 2008, at 6:25:59
In reply to Lou's reminder to the administration-hpctntf, posted by Lou Pilder on April 18, 2008, at 6:34:27
> > Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
> > In regards to the procedure for reminding the administartion concerning outstanding requests, I sent two notifications a few days ago that one is outstanding.
> > Lou PIlder
>
> Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
> In regards to your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the notification in question was one of two that was sent on April 5, 2008
> Lou Pilder
>
Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the above.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Sigismund on April 23, 2008, at 16:51:19
In reply to Lou's request to the administration-notif-B, posted by Lou Pilder on April 8, 2008, at 16:24:22
Today's the 24th.
That must have been 19 days ago.
Posted by Lou Pilder on April 24, 2008, at 7:22:58
In reply to Re: Lou's request to the administration-notif-B » Lou Pilder, posted by Sigismund on April 23, 2008, at 16:51:19
> Today's the 24th.
>
> That must have been 19 days ago.Sigismund,
You wrote,[...19 days ago....].
The TOS here write that the administration will either reply to the member sending the notification or post in the thread where the statement in question appears.
I am asking those that are interested in this discussion here to click on the links that I am offering that bring out what is known as a {fallacy} in reasoning to persuade people in their minds to a particular belief about something. These fallacious arguments have been used for thousands of years and can be effective, even though they could be false, because some people, (let me refer to them as the {less-informed}), are not informed about them.
Here are some links to these arguments of fallacy. I have posted the {straw man} fallacy and here is a link to some others . I like the wikipedia presentation of these fallacies because there are otther links offered and you could get ideas to use your own search from them to bring out more examples.
I would like the members here to have knowlege of these fallacies >so that they can recognize them< if they appear here >so that they can respond accordingly< and perhaps not be persuaded by a fallacious argument.
One here is what is called {false dilemma} and the link gives a way to decern such and shows some outgrowths of that fallacy. (citation falsdilma). Then a link to a post that has a link to {straw man}and there are other links in that of other fallacies that i would like for you to take some time to aquaint yourselves with them if you like so that when you see them, you could have the knowlege that they are fallacious.
Lou
citation falsdilma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
straw man
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080313/msgs/823196.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on April 25, 2008, at 17:52:07
In reply to Lou's reminder to the administration-tustannotf?, posted by Lou Pilder on April 23, 2008, at 6:25:59
> > > Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
> > > In regards to the procedure for reminding the administartion concerning outstanding requests, I sent two notifications a few days ago that one is outstanding.
> > > Lou PIlder
> >
> > Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
> > In regards to your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the notification in question was one of two that was sent on April 5, 2008
> > Lou Pilder
> >
> Mr. Hsiung and his deputies,
> In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the above.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung and his deputies,
In regards to your policy to keep reminding you, the notification from April 5 is outstanding.
I have the following concerns because of that the notification has not been either addressed on the thread in question or that I have received a reply by babblemail or email. These concerns are:
A.if this notification is not replied to, then could that mean that if I was to send another notification about a different statement, could that also be not replied to as in this case?
B. why is the notification not responded to?
C. Are there two standards here, for notifications because I do know that other notifications have been responded to sent by other members here?
D. Is there something in the post that is beyond all the deputies and Mr. Hsiung so that they can not answer it? If so, if you would like to have more infomation from me, please just ask.
E.Is it in all of your thinking that it will be good for the community as a whole to not reply to my notification? If so, why could that be in your thinking?
F. other concerns not stated.
If each deputy and Mr. Hsiung could reply her in this thread about my concerns here, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
Lou Pilder
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.