Shown: posts 1 to 3 of 3. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 5, 2006, at 7:04:22
Dr. Hsiung,
In your rule about consecutive posts, you use the term,{less confident posters} as the subject that you have made the rule for so that they {have more of a chance..and be easier for them...].
Well, if you are saying that just by one of these posters, {the less confident}, >seeing< that a name of one poster is there 4 times without another name in between causes them to think in some way that if there were only 3 of the same name without another name in between that they could have a {better chance} to post in that thread, then;
A. could you explain why you think that?
B. could you explain why, if there were two long posts, verses 4 short posts by the same member, without another name in between, that the {less confident poster} could have {more of a chance}?
C. In regards to any reason that you may give for [B] above, could that reason, if you give one, also mean that there could be a rule made by you here so that one could not use more than 3 words in a post that have more than 3 syllables so that it would also be {easier for the less confident to join in}?
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 5, 2006, at 7:37:37
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung, posted by Lou Pilder on October 5, 2006, at 7:04:22
Dr. Hsiung,
In your rule here about 3 consecutive posts, you write in your FAQ,[...Giving them (the less confident posters) more of a chance makes it easier for them also to help...].
But what if one is posting educational content? For instance, in my exposing of the potential, IMO, of the potential for a post to arrouse antisemitic feelings, my posts were not of need of anyone helping me to reveal that the statements in the post had the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings, and I needed more than 3 posts to bring out that so that others could see the potential for the statement to arrouse antisemitic feelings
Are you saying that you give a higher priority to {...making it easier for less confident posters to help...} than to me being allowed to expose statements that IMO have the potential arrouse antisemitic feelings?
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 5, 2006, at 10:27:17
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-nedshlp, posted by Lou Pilder on October 5, 2006, at 7:37:37
Friends,
In the archives, there are many threads where I exposed the putting down and accusing of Jews and other faiths. I did this by using sound educational principles of teaching that have to do with a science of teaching, sometimes related to what is known as the use of {discovery}.
I have advanced degrees in relation to that teaching concept. The archives show how I am able to do this by;
A. posting very small increments of a concept to be discovered. This {breaking down} is a teaching concept that is geneally accepted in the educational field to be effective in teaching what can not be seen prominatly as if it was in a whole context.
This is one reason why I do not post the whole matter in one post.
B. The posting of {line-upon-line...precept upon precept...hear a little there a little...} is generally accpeted historically as a sound teaching concept. This could allow for others to join in at there choice when they can see what it is that may have been unbeknowing to them. I think that when posts have one concept rather than many in it, that it may be easier for others to join in, for Dr. Hsiung writes that if there are more than 3 posts by a poster without another name in between them, that that {may} discourage {less confident members}form joining in. But then if it {may} discourage, could it also mean that it {may not} discourage?
If you would like to see those posts from the archives , you could email me if you like. I could also show you posts that have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings that could benifit from my use of {discovery}mode of teaching that could unveil what can not be easily seen.
Lou Pilder
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.